![]() Plenty of Mo owners been running Mo just to check the credit ems odd this wasn't screamed about a long time ago if it's real. Have to look & see if there's any confirmation elsewhere on this. Who was that? Was he reliable (if that is his only example I'm gonna say no)? Only shot he didn't clip is the example of how the shells landing are not a problem up close. Wish he would have had at least 1 volley where he let the shells go all the way from being fired to landing w/out him either (1st example) pulling out of binocular mode to set AA sector) or (2nd & 3rd examples) cutting the clip between firing & then going back to it right before his shells land. Oh, and it appears there might be a bug with Missouri at the moment: (481) Torpedoes aren't the only broken thing atm - YouTube A better repair party, especially at high tier, is infinitely more valuable than a short (9.5km) radar. And I already own a T9 USN premium BB: Georgia. At this point, it's just an Iowa that trade a better repair party for a 9.5 km radar. Personally, I completed the campaign, and I did not get the ship. It was first announced with the following news article: Developer Bulletin for Update 0.10.7 | World of Warships The mission was a way to compensate previous owners people who get Missouri after the patch hit (10.7, for the Missouri's return) only get a normal T9 premium. ![]() Indeed, it's been well explained on community streams and within a news article.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |